Christine Pantophlet I think Hilbert Haar might have gotten the gist of what I wrote in my blog incorrectly.
I however did not get my facts wrong.
1) Jeffrey DID quit the DP, a while back.
2) He has been talking about starting his own party.
3)The only link to his Facebook page, is the one that YOU are the only administrator to....
4) My blog was not a fact or a statement, it was a question about whether it was a coincidence that two DP members who have recently left the party would be starting TWO separate parties.
5) THE INFO COPIED FROM THE INTERNET IS VERIFIABLE! But his mistake was that he published a question as fact.
6)How do you call yourself a revolutionary, when you're working for who you are supposed to be fighting against?
7) You call yourself a semi-socialist, but in 40 years the DP party (YOUR party) has not allowed even the crumbs to trickle down to the common people.
8) The DP Party wouldn't piss on the common man to put him out if he was on FIRE!
9) You cannot seriously consider change Alston, when you enable and are quite complicit in assisting the "Old" system.
10) It's very difficult to take you comments seriously online, because you NEVER acknowledge that the DP has ever done anything wrong!
11) After the DP lost, your first comment about buying votes, was very much a "sour grapes" comments, since the DP has been buying votes since before YOU were born.
12) You are quite young, and unlike Stuart Johnson, you have not quite been sullied by the radioactive fallout of the DP. So
as a young intelligent St Maartener, set yourself apart, and leave the old system behind.
13 A revolution is a full 360 degrees,isn't?
Which would put you exactly back in the very same spot that you started from, which would be the DP.
14) If you truly want and believe in change, then you would distance yourself, and quit defending a party that have never, nor would they ever defend you.

Okay, I've been sitting on this story for the past two weeks, but I guess, I'm going to analyze the new political climate for a bit.
Jeffrey Richardson, was supposed to have handed in his resignation to DP leader, Sarah Wescot Williams several Sundays ago.
So, I waited for the press release, or some kind of statement from Jeffrey, but I was told that the DP did not want the news to become public, so I decided to sit, and wait.
Then,
I carefully read the article on the front page of the "Today", You know,The one where Ferrier put his resignation at the "disposal" of the DP.
My unique translation, was that Michael Ferrier finally said, "Either HE goes, or I go."
He of course would be Julian Rollocks, but we all know how great their relationship is, so that theory could not possibly be true!
Then Mr Rollocks made two brief appearances in the Today paper.
In my assessment, the first piece, was simply an article placed in the paper, by Mr. Rollocks, to say "Hey!"
"I'm still here"
"I'm still relevant"!
The second article featuring Mr. Rollocks, was far more interesting, and thus had to be read, and re-read.
The article on page 7 of the "Today" paper, first starts out with nothing but a long list of St Maarten Democratic Party misdeeds.I even learned for the first time of certain questionable moves by Maria, "The Sky is The Limit Foundation", etc. etc.
I was given a concise recap of ALL of the misdeeds of Laveist and Maria and Theo, etc. etc. etc.
We'll follow up on "The Sky is The Limit Foundation", at a later date.The article, gives the impression that Mr Rollocks is in St Maarten, handling his business, but he's not. He's been everywhere, but in St Maarten, for the past several weeks.
The Article seemed to appear for two reasons.
To give the appearance that Mr. Rollocks is very much in St Maarten, and in control(you know like how Osama Bin Laden sends out those videos, from random areas around the world, to give the impression that he's still alive, and a threat).
 He also wanted to serve Michael Ferrier with a backhanded compliment, or basically a diss.
The most vital and telling piece to this whole article, is the final paragraphs.
The "old branches" perspective.
When Mr Rollocks returns to the island, is he going to let us know who these old branches are?
He then goes on to lay the blame at everyone else's feet, but his own, because St Maarteners are too stupid to realize who the main DP antagonist is/was.
BUT...BY FAR THE MOST TELLING STATEMENT WOULD BE THE LAST PARAGRAPH:..."We do not wish the Democratic Party any harm; because we think that a well-functioning democracy..."
If you read the article carefully, Mr Rollocks, who is supposed to be an integral part of the DP, their chief adviser, is not referring to the party as US,
Who are "WE" Mr Rollocks?
That statement clearly shows that there is no "US" in the DP any longer, if there ever was.
And if you are calling yourself "WE", the the Democratic Party, must now be considered THEM.
So that could be considered confirmation, that the DP is now a party of two separate factions.
Still I needed more evidence. So I did some online research, and...voila!Jeffrey Richardson IS a part of the new revolutionary party on FACEBOOK, which was set up by Alston Alvarino Lourens.
It's fascinating what you can learn, when you spend 18 hour days online.
TAKEN FROM JEFFREY RICHARDSON'S FACEBOOK PAGE(thanks for the invite Jeffrey):
SXM Needs a new Political Revolution!

•  Wall
•  Info
•  Discussions
•  Photos

Description:This is a group to begin the organization of a new Political Party on St. Maarten... A Political Representation of our Island's best Qualified, Dedicated and Educated young adults. Please feel free to join and leave comments... Nominate persons you feel should be part of this New Party... Also go ahead and suggest a name... This is the beginning of a revolution, be a part of it...Privacy Type:Open: All content is public.

So my question would be:
Is this Jeffrey's new party, or is that just another coincidence?
Is the DP separated into "Team Rollocks", and "Team Ferrier"?
Is Stuey going to jump ship soon? (Honestly, he told me that he's sticking with DP, but I simply don't believe him)
Is Theo Heyliger going to be a part of this "revolution", or is he really teaming up with Gracita to form ANOTHER party?
Yeah the Theo/Gracita rumor has been afloat for awhile now.
What can I say, they do make a cute couple.
And they cover most demographics. Gracita appealing to the Black and female demographic,
Theo covering the White/Asian and male demographic. I say White and Asian, because Theo can pass for both.
Don't ask me how that happened.
I do know that it would be interesting seeing some strong, new contenders
for the next elections.
When Mr Rollocks is considering trimming old branches, he must have considered the fact that Sarah Wescot Williams is the oldest branch on the tree.
That's not an ageist diss, it's a fact. And if you're considering all political experience,
Then Mr Rollocks, himself would have to be trimmed, considering the fact that
he's been in those same gutters, since Theo Heyliger was in Pampers.
I've been trying to stay out of politics, and work on my archives,
but sometimes I feel compelled......
j.r.