The St Maarten Democratic Party were swept,
wiped out,
destroyed!
Where did they go wrong?
My personal analysis......
1) Sarah was conned,
into believing that she needed Julian Rollocks as an advisor.
She trusted and believed him, and it cost her everything.
2) Julian Rollocks was never about the DP, or any other party, Julian Rollocks was in it for himself.
3) You cannot trust any advisor,
who has defected and betrayed every other party that he's worked for. The DP is like the wife who has been cheated on. The husband is cheating, but whenever anyone warns the wife, she or he automatically becomes the "bad" person.
4) Sarah did not inherit any of Julians friends, just his enemies.
5) Julian Rollocks, consumed by power, continued his malevolent acts, and the destruction of the DP was never his concern, and he never cared.
6) The Democratic Party lost its connect with their "grass roots" supporters,
at a certain point, even your most loyal supporters will turn against you, if you are doing them wrong.
7) Rather than being in it 100% for the DP, Mr Rollocks used the DP, as an instrument, to carry out his personal vendettas, once again it was all about him.
8) During the DP press conference a couple of months ago, Mr. Rollocks used their press conference, as a personal podium to vent his dislike of certain people, ( Fernando Clark, The Daily Herald) rather than to speak as a legitimate representative of the DP. Everyone remembers the press conference, but no one remembers what the DP message was, or even what it was about, the only thing anyone remembers, is that Mr Julian Rollocks used the platform to threaten local personalities, that did not agree with him, or felt that because he was a politician, and they were a comedian, they could poke fun at him.
9) Mr Rollocks, was the catalyst of the scandals that consumed these elections. Even then, rather than doing the right thing, and focus on his job as being the DP's top strategist, he focused on people who he felt had "wronged" him.
10) The DP and its members, chose to associate themselves with, and defend J.R., knowing that he was up to scandalous activities, but were to afraid to control him, or tackle him head on.
11) Mr. Rollocks believes in the "divide and conquer" theory, that's why certain members of the DP, and the NA were set up..................
the ultimate goal, only known by a few.
12) People like Maria Buncamper Molanusl, Olga Williams, Stuart Johnson, Jeffrey Richardson, Roy Marlin, William Marlin etc. etc, decided to take what Mr. Rollocks said to them at face value, ignoring his character and blaming the outsider.
13) The Democratic Party has an "inclusive" policy, and they do believe " White is right!", but it isn't all the time. Because they sure spent a lot of time in parliament, laughing at the NA slate, because it was "too Black", and they simply couldn't win.
14 I'm waiting for the "Black Party", and so are most of the people I know, we are tired of the same redundant bulls***!
15) Mr Rollocks didn't wage war against the PPA and the NA, he waged wars against private citizens, e.g.... Fernando C, Bibi S, Judith R. etc. etc., he was distracted by his own vendettas, and agendas.
It was NEVER about anyone else!
16) Mr Rollocks enjoys threatening to scandal someones name, if they don't comply with any of his B.S. offers, and this time it failed. Because he tried to discredit and slander someone who was ready for him. At some point in December, I realized that J.R. and J.R. , were going to be taking it to the mat.
17) The DP's top advisor, Mr. Rollocks, is not half the svengali, as he deludes himself into believing that he is........it's mind over matter........and that's why the psychosomatic symptoms set in.
18) Mr Rollocks pays to advertise in the daily tabloid "The Today", and that's why "The Today" who are supposed to be considered "journalist with integrity", slandered a private citizens name,
but it's alright since everyone remembers THEIR EDITORS abuse scandal.
If I were to get online, and do the the TODAY'S editor, what Mr Rollocks was trying to do to Mr. Fernando Clark.......call his sponsors (advertisers), provide scandalous details, destroy his life and career, try to make him a beggar on the street, then maybe The Today wouldn't stick to lies, but publish the truth, and the other side like they are supposed to as "unbiased" journalists.
19) Mr Julian Rollocks, set up a lot of his own party members to be ridiculed, but anything goes in politics, if it's supposed to get the attention off of the person, who is actually messing up.
20) Oh, by the way.........
I did visit the TODAY newspaper, and I have my evidence, proof and witnesses, but they chose NOT TO PUBLISH THE TRUTH, because certain people pay for ads in his broke ass tabloid.......that was a B.A. move Santa!!!
21) I've been threatened with everything, and by anyone associated with Mr Rollocks, because I chose to be honest.
Here's a hint.................I'M A ROUMOU!
I CANNOT BE INTIMIDATED BY ANYTHING YOU PEOPLE TRY TO SEND AT ME!!!!!!!!
That was 21, wasn't it? I might be digressing.
I have a top 1000 list of how the DP failed, and elections are this October, so I should be able to cover most of the bases until then.
Mwuaaaah
And to my dear, departed DP.....
Don't let the Door hit ya,
where the Good Lord split ya..
signed
j. roumou
c. pantophlet
d. minsk
p. noir
a. jackosn
k. hardeman
j. richardon
d. gatita
j. gatito
j. sussan
etc. etc. etc.etc