Just added the Anguillan political feed, will be adding Chicago, then the Netherlands next.
I do, and have receive criticism, and that's okay, because I realized that I would not be a victim.
Supporters of Jeffrey Richardson are doing him no favors by attacking me, because Jeffrey knows that there was something wrong with those checks that he was writing.
And Jeffrey knows that I've saved all email communications with him.
Jeffrey Richardson knows that HE also wrote up a contract for me to sign (I have the copies), and I refused to.
I knew that going up against the DP political machine, would make me a target, and yet I felt compelled to do it anyway.
People want to read a few blogs, on just ONE of my blog sites, and they want to base their judgment on that.
The fact of the matter is that I run several independent blogs, some deal with politics, some are for people interested in vacationing in St Maarten, some are about African dance, etc, etc.
So to the people who think, that all I do is sit and blog about St Maarten Politicians, you could not be further from the truth.
Because all of the information is already provided, it takes less than 10 minutes of my day, to write a 100-200 word article.
I then spend several hours working on my network bringing in over 500 new contacts per day.
I have to process video, and photographs, i work on building the websites that I've been paid for.
I work as a freelance photographer.
I run the feeds that puts my blogs and articles into the major search engines.
So I am quite busy.
I'm not obsessed with politics or any politicians, so trying to attack me will not work.
What many naive St Maarteners don't realize is that I've told less than 0.005% of what actually happened, there's a lot more.
Now that the elections are over, you think it's safe to attack me, but there's another election right around the corner.
No one realizes how NICE I've been to certain members of the DP considering what they have put me through.
Back in December, I blogged that there was going to be a Big Bang FTB style, come 2010.
I have yet to blog about the truly Big Political St Maarten Stories.
I am also not a politician, I am a freelance writer, photographer, etc...
So it actually isn't bad for an artist to be considered eccentric or crazy, so I was quite flattered by your comment.
Keep up the good work!
Because whenever you attack me, you just inspire me to get on my laptop,
and blog some more.
And I'll be back,
with another blog.

Because I am fair and balanced, I have to acknowledge that The Today paper did finally print my version of what happened in the case involving Mr Rollocks.
Since it's been five days since I visited the Today paper, I assumed that they simply were not going to print what I said.
We are working on the regional and international feeds, this site is still very much a work in process.
On youtube we are: sxmisnice, so anyone who has been photographed by me, or were in any of my videos, can go to SXMISNICE of Youtube, and check out yourself.
On Facebook we are a part of the ADLOFT M network, and you can send a friend invite to : Sint Maarten
If you run a local business, and want your business links posted, you can post info and links about your business on Facebook at:
ST MAARTEN BUSINESS NETWORK
If you want to get the latest online political info on ALL candidates and parties, become a Facebook fan of:
ST MAARTEN POLITICS.
We are working on our websites, which of course are still under construction. I can't give another launch date, I'll just get jinxed again.
We lost Christian Lloyd, someone who I've always known to be a cool person, so condolences to his family.

The St Maarten Democratic Party were swept,
wiped out,
destroyed!
Where did they go wrong?
My personal analysis......
1) Sarah was conned,
into believing that she needed Julian Rollocks as an advisor.
She trusted and believed him, and it cost her everything.
2) Julian Rollocks was never about the DP, or any other party, Julian Rollocks was in it for himself.
3) You cannot trust any advisor,
who has defected and betrayed every other party that he's worked for. The DP is like the wife who has been cheated on. The husband is cheating, but whenever anyone warns the wife, she or he automatically becomes the "bad" person.
4) Sarah did not inherit any of Julians friends, just his enemies.
5) Julian Rollocks, consumed by power, continued his malevolent acts, and the destruction of the DP was never his concern, and he never cared.
6) The Democratic Party lost its connect with their "grass roots" supporters,
at a certain point, even your most loyal supporters will turn against you, if you are doing them wrong.
7) Rather than being in it 100% for the DP, Mr Rollocks used the DP, as an instrument, to carry out his personal vendettas, once again it was all about him.
8) During the DP press conference a couple of months ago, Mr. Rollocks used their press conference, as a personal podium to vent his dislike of certain people, ( Fernando Clark, The Daily Herald) rather than to speak as a legitimate representative of the DP. Everyone remembers the press conference, but no one remembers what the DP message was, or even what it was about, the only thing anyone remembers, is that Mr Julian Rollocks used the platform to threaten local personalities, that did not agree with him, or felt that because he was a politician, and they were a comedian, they could poke fun at him.
9) Mr Rollocks, was the catalyst of the scandals that consumed these elections. Even then, rather than doing the right thing, and focus on his job as being the DP's top strategist, he focused on people who he felt had "wronged" him.
10) The DP and its members, chose to associate themselves with, and defend J.R., knowing that he was up to scandalous activities, but were to afraid to control him, or tackle him head on.
11) Mr. Rollocks believes in the "divide and conquer" theory, that's why certain members of the DP, and the NA were set up..................
the ultimate goal, only known by a few.
12) People like Maria Buncamper Molanusl, Olga Williams, Stuart Johnson, Jeffrey Richardson, Roy Marlin, William Marlin etc. etc, decided to take what Mr. Rollocks said to them at face value, ignoring his character and blaming the outsider.
13) The Democratic Party has an "inclusive" policy, and they do believe " White is right!", but it isn't all the time. Because they sure spent a lot of time in parliament, laughing at the NA slate, because it was "too Black", and they simply couldn't win.
14 I'm waiting for the "Black Party", and so are most of the people I know, we are tired of the same redundant bulls***!
15) Mr Rollocks didn't wage war against the PPA and the NA, he waged wars against private citizens, e.g.... Fernando C, Bibi S, Judith R. etc. etc., he was distracted by his own vendettas, and agendas.
It was NEVER about anyone else!
16) Mr Rollocks enjoys threatening to scandal someones name, if they don't comply with any of his B.S. offers, and this time it failed. Because he tried to discredit and slander someone who was ready for him. At some point in December, I realized that J.R. and J.R. , were going to be taking it to the mat.
17) The DP's top advisor, Mr. Rollocks, is not half the svengali, as he deludes himself into believing that he is........it's mind over matter........and that's why the psychosomatic symptoms set in.
18) Mr Rollocks pays to advertise in the daily tabloid "The Today", and that's why "The Today" who are supposed to be considered "journalist with integrity", slandered a private citizens name,
but it's alright since everyone remembers THEIR EDITORS abuse scandal.
If I were to get online, and do the the TODAY'S editor, what Mr Rollocks was trying to do to Mr. Fernando Clark.......call his sponsors (advertisers), provide scandalous details, destroy his life and career, try to make him a beggar on the street, then maybe The Today wouldn't stick to lies, but publish the truth, and the other side like they are supposed to as "unbiased" journalists.
19) Mr Julian Rollocks, set up a lot of his own party members to be ridiculed, but anything goes in politics, if it's supposed to get the attention off of the person, who is actually messing up.
20) Oh, by the way.........
I did visit the TODAY newspaper, and I have my evidence, proof and witnesses, but they chose NOT TO PUBLISH THE TRUTH, because certain people pay for ads in his broke ass tabloid.......that was a B.A. move Santa!!!
21) I've been threatened with everything, and by anyone associated with Mr Rollocks, because I chose to be honest.
Here's a hint.................I'M A ROUMOU!
I CANNOT BE INTIMIDATED BY ANYTHING YOU PEOPLE TRY TO SEND AT ME!!!!!!!!
That was 21, wasn't it? I might be digressing.
I have a top 1000 list of how the DP failed, and elections are this October, so I should be able to cover most of the bases until then.
Mwuaaaah
And to my dear, departed DP.....
Don't let the Door hit ya,
where the Good Lord split ya..
signed
j. roumou
c. pantophlet
d. minsk
p. noir
a. jackosn
k. hardeman
j. richardon
d. gatita
j. gatito
j. sussan
etc. etc. etc.etc
 

Here's a book excerpt by the late great Machiavelli, I had actually read a few of his books by the age of 14 or so. I was not impressed by Machiavelli, because as complex as his plotting, and strategy was, I always knew what he was up to.

Niccolo Machiavelli was born on May 3, 1469, in Florence, Italy. He eventually became a man who lived his life for politics and patriotism. Right now, however, he is associated with corrupt, totalitarian government. The reason for this is a small pamphlet he wrote called The Prince to gain influence with the ruling Medici family in Florence. The political genius of Niccolo Machiavelli was overshadowed by the reputation that was unfairly given to him because of a misunderstanding of his views on politics.
Machiavelli's life was very interesting. He lived a nondescript childhood in Florence, and his main political experience in his youth was watching Savanarola from afar. Soon after Savanarola was executed, Machiavelli entered the Florentine government as a secretary. His position quickly rose, however, and was soon engaging in diplomatic missions. He met many of the important politicians of the day, such as the Pope and the King of France, but none had more impact on him than a prince of the Papal States, Cesare Borgia. Borgia was a cunning, cruel man, very much like the one portrayed in The Prince. Machiavelli did not truly like Borgia's policies, but he thought that with a ruler like Borgia the Florentines could unite Italy, which was Machiavelli's goal throughout his life. Unfortunately for Machiavelli, he was dismissed from office when the Medici came to rule Florence and the Republic was overthrown. The lack of a job forced him to switch to writing about politics instead of being active. His diplomatic missions were his last official government positions.


When Machiavelli lost his office, he desperately wanted to return to politics. He tried to gain the favor of the Medici by writing a book of what he thought were the Medici's goals and dedicating it to them. And so The Prince was written for that purpose. Unfortunately, the Medici didn't agree with what the book said, so he was out of a job. But when the public saw the book, they were outraged. The people wondered how cruel a man could be to think evil thoughts like the ones in The Prince, and this would come back to haunt him when he was alive and dead. However, if the people wanted to know what Machiavelli really stood for, they should have read his "Discourses on Livy", which explain his full political philosophy. But not enough people had and have, and so the legacy of The Prince continues to define Machiavelli to the general public.


A few years later the Medici were kicked out of Florence. The republic was re-established, and Machiavelli ran to retake the office he had left so many years ago. But the reputation that The Prince had established made people think his philosophy was like the Medici, so he was not elected. And here the sharp downhill of his life began. His health began to fail him, and he died months later, in 1527.


Machiavelli had been unfairly attacked all of his life because of a bad reputation. But it only got worse after he died. He was continually blasted for his "support" of corrupt ruling. In fact, Machiavellian now means corrupt government. Only recently has his true personality come to light. The world must change it's vision of the cold, uncaring Machiavelli to the correct view of a patriot and a political geNiccolò Machiavelli
(1469-1527) Life and Works
. . The Prince
. . Leadership
Bibliography
Internet Sources In 1498, Niccolò Machiavelli began his career as an active politician in the independent city-state of Florence, engaging in diplomatic missions through France and Germany as well as Italy. After more than a decade of public service, he was driven from his post when the republic collapsed. Repeated efforts to win the confidence and approval of the new regime were unsuccessful, and Machiavelli was forced into retirement and a life of detached scholarship about the political process instead of direct participation in it. The books for which he is remembered were published only after his death.

Machiavelli originally wrote Principe (The Prince) (1513) in hopes of securing the favor of the ruling Medici family, and he deliberately made its claims provocative. The Prince is an intensely practical guide to the exercise of raw political power over a Renaissance principality. Allowing for the unpredictable influence of fortune, Machiavelli argued that it is primarily the character or vitality or skill of the individual leader that determines the success of any state. The book surveys various bold means of acquiring and maintaining the principality and evaluates each of them solely by reference to its likelihood of augmenting the glory of the prince while serving the public interest. It is this focus on practical success by any means, even at the expense of traditional moral values, that earned Machiavelli's scheme a reputation for ruthlessness, deception, and cruelty.

His Dell'arte della guerra (The Art of War) (1520) explains in detail effective procedures for the acquisition, maintenance, and use of a military force. Even in his more leisurely reflections on the political process, Machiavelli often wrote in a similar vein. The Discorsi sopra la prima Deca di Tito Livio (Discourses on Livy) (1531) review the history of the Roman republic, with greater emphasis on the role of fortune and a clear admiration for republican government. Here, too, however, Machiavelli's conception of the proper application of morality to practical political life is one that judges the skill of all participants in terms of the efficacy with which they achieve noble ends. Whatever the form of government, Machiavelli held, only success and glory really matter.



Recommended Reading: Primary sources:

• Niccolò Machiavelli, Opere, ed. by Sergio Bertelli and Franco Gaeta (Feltrinelli, 1960-   )
• Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, tr. by George Bull (Penguin, 1999) {Order from Amazon.com}
• Niccolo Machiavelli, Discourses, tr. by Leslie J. Walker and Bernard Crick (Viking, 1985) {Order from Amazon.

nius.


















http://books.google.com/books?id=05R7kYOKD0cC&printsec=frontcover&dq=machiavelli&source=bl&ots=dI9GANv7aF&sig=eYVzBWhWG4IUwAmQcOuQXyRzXAI&hl=en&ei=PAVeS7fGOIeXtgfN_amrAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CCIQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=&f=false

MORE VIDEOS AND PHOTO MONTAGES TO COME!
ALL VIDEOS CAN BE SEEN AT FACEBOOK: SINT MAARTEN
YOUTUBE: SXMISNICE

I don't agree, and dislike most politicians,
but I'm going out to vote, as soon as these
election day pictures and videos are uploaded.
VOTE!

When the pawn hits the conflicts he thinks like a king
What he knows throws the blows when he goes to the fight
And he'll win the whole thing 'fore he enters the ring
There's no body to batter when your mind is your might
So when you go solo, you hold your own hand
And remember that depth is the greatest of heights
And if you know where you stand, then you know where to land
And if you fall it won't matter, cuz you'll know that you're right

Mr Rollocks believes that because he has friends at certain papers, that he will be able to lie about anything, have it published as facts, and that will take care of the whole matter, but it will not.
Mr Rollocks has obviously forgotten how many hours I've spent at Parliament during the past seven or eight months.
Mr Rollocks has a habit of calling people, and then making them wait for hours, while he chats on the phone and tries to look busy and important.
So I've spent many months, just sitting there, usually with my laptops and cameras, waiting for Mr Rollocks to get off of his phone to either pay me, or provide me with info for one of his websites, or online "projects".
Mr Rollocks decided to say anything to the Today newspaper, figuring that even if he lied, I wouldn't be able to prove it, but he is very much mistaken, since more people were fed my blog yesterday, than the population of St Maarten, and I can actually back up what I say with witnesses and physical proof.
I want to thank the St Maarteners, who are emailing me, and telling me that they printed copies of what I wrote, so that they could pass it on to family and friends.
Maybe the Today called him unexpectedly, and it was the best lies he could come up with on such short notice.
Ordinarily Mr Rollocks is an excellent liar, however pills can affect your Polker skills.
One person works/has worked for Mr Rollocks' Caribbean Pawn, and that would be Cindy, who appears to be a very nice lady, caught in the middle of something she had nothing to do with.
My work for Mr Rollocks included building two websites, which remain unfinished, because he never had the time to provide the content and the material.
Mr Rollocks would call me, bright and early to show up at Parliament, to get his sites completed, or to pay me. He would then show up hours later, if ever, and then he was always to busy, or he couldn't find what he was looking for, or he was having some kind of personal issue, and couldn't deal with any type of business at the moment.
I did communicate with Minister of Justice Roland Duncan, as Julian Rollocks, and Mr Rollocks was there, telling me what to write. I know the day, the hour and the messages that I wrote.
Why would Mr Rollocks do that?
Because whenever Mr Rollocks wanted to appear intelligent/literate online, he would have me do the writing for him, which I didn't mind doing, because although Mr Rollocks is a very intelligent man, you would not know that from his writing, and when you post a , comment or whatever online, it's for the world to see, so yes he did have me write some of his online, especially on Facebook comments and emails for him.
If Mr Duncan or Julian has forgotten the exchange, I had sent a friend invite to Mr Duncan, and Mr Duncan basically said, "why should I become your friend Julian?"
Mr Rollocks kept trying to write a response, but I kept having to correct his grammar, and spelling and finally I took over and wrote as him, I had done it before that instance, and after with his consent and with HIS blessing, because writing can be frustrating for him.
Why would Julian lie and say I worked at the Pawn Shop?
Because he's backing out of the "side" work that he had me doing.
I started the websites.
Did 2 online promotional videos that I added to the Youtube account I created for him.
I hired the models for the web-ad, I shot the video my self.
I processed, converted, edited, re-dubbed and uploaded the video for him, and I did the same for his "Strictly Business" website, and video.
I shot over 200 HQ photographs of Mr Rollocks, and added them to his various social and websites.
I set up his Facebook, and added it to my network which is now over 20.000 on Facebook.
And that my friends, is the reason Mr Rollocks has over 1000 "friends" on Facebook, when he doesn't remember how to get into his Facebook account, much less add a friend.
Mr Rollocks never had a problem with any work that I did for him, until he began a downward spiral sometime in November 2009.
It started with his wife joining Facebook and sending an invite.
Of course I accepted his wife's invitation for him, but when he found out, he was furious, and demanded that I block her from seeing his Facebook profile.
Why would he do this? Because several women who it appears knows Mr Rollocks personally, were leaving what could be considered suggestive comments on his Facebook profile, which simply does not look right, if you are a married politician.
I told Mr Rollocks exactly this, "you need to check your ho's Mr. Rollocks, because they're writing on your profile, and it does not look right." "Speak to them, and tell them to be more discreet, because your wife is now one of your friends on Facebook".
Rather than simply speaking to the females in question, or blocking the females, he blocked his wife. I begged him not to.
Then a couple days later, Mr Rollocks is contacting me in a Panic...."I'm all over the internet, get me off, get me off!"
I don't know what he's talking about, so of course I Googled it.
OMG there is an article about his wife showing up from Curacao, and doing major damage to him, the mistress, the house, the car etc. etc. etc.
So of course I emailed the story to all of my friends in the States, because I HAD WARNED HIM.
At this time, communication and our business relationship broke down, because he was mostly hiding out, and I couldn't always reach him.
He was still paying me for services rendered, because work was still being done.

I have to attend to some business now, but this story will continue when we get into Fernando Clark, Bibi Shaw, the source we call "Deep Throat", he it appears might have been working on Mr Rollocks' behalf, Mr Rollocks' family member who is claiming that he defrauded him, and Mr Rollocks' mysterious illness.
Mr Rollocks might have forgotten that on the day he entered the hospital, he called me three times, then he had Cindy call me, then his relative kept calling me, and updating me.
And that's why when I blogged about him entering the hospital, and wished him the best, no one in DP even knew, that he had been admitted to the hospital.
If you don't believe that, go to Mr Rollocks' Facebook profile, and read where Stuart Johnson, DP #7, I think, is desperately trying to reach him.
I have to go, but I'll be back to defend myself, and my character either later, or tomorrow.

THE OTHER J.R.

It would be fascinating to see if the Today newspaper publishes my response,
seeing as there are two sides to this story.
My blogs are published through an international feed to thousands,
who if they find what I write interesting enough,
send it to thousands more.
I have spoken with the editor of the Today paper before,
it was during the Fernando Clark incident,
and when I began the online blogs.

I had the most delightful visit this morning, and the person had a "Today" paper. Mr. Rollocks it seems is finally responding to some of the statements made about him.
To the editor of the Today newspaper, very little of what was written in your paper were facts, so I'm not sure who you got the story from.
1) I was NEVER an employee of The Pawn Shop. Mr Rollocks it seems might be medicated as usual, and that's why he always confuses stuff like that. And his mental stability should be put into question, because he does show signs of having a narcissistic personality disorder.
2) I am an independent contractor, therefore I've done work for Julian Rollocks, I've never been his employee.
3) I was NOT laid off last year, how do you lay of someone that is not your employee? I got a text message from Mr. Rollocks, at Christmas saying he was broke, and yes I have saved the text-After he found out that his relative had given me access to a goldmine of documents.
4) Mr Rollocks never complained when I wrote as him before, in fact he was usually there. See my initials are J.R. too, so I have written as Mr Julian Rollocks several times, because Mr Rollocks cannot put two words together without four or five spelling and grammatical errors. Here's an example, I've corresponded with Mr. Roland Duncan, on Facebook as Julian Rollocks, with Mr Rollocks present.
So Mr Rollocks cannot pretend that someone gained unauthorized access to his accounts and impersonated him, since I've been impersonating him with his consent since October. So anyone who received any email communication with NO spelling errors from Julian Rollocks signed JR, that was probably me writing as Julian with his consent and permission.
5) In December when Mr. Rollocks texted me he was broke, and basically broke the verbal contract we had, he in essence gave up the rights to any of the accounts and work I created, because he broke the contract!
6) Unlike Mr Rollocks, I take No medication for anything! If I were unstable, why do I STILL have access to confidential DP emails, and why do I control all of Mr Rollocks' online accounts?
7) Mr. Rollocks never had an issue with me, until he demanded that I contact the RBTT bank headquarters in Trinidad, to slander Mr Fernando Clark. He wanted Fernando Clark to lose all sponsorship, everything! I believed going after a COMEDIAN in this way was a bit much.
8) I am the person who Mr Rollocks calls to get his passwords, to any of his accounts, because even when I tell him repeatedly, for some reason it doesn't register.
9) Only a mentally unstable person would dish dirt to an online blogger about his own party, you know Julian, how did I learn about Erno, Roy, Stuart and Jeffrey?
10) Only a mentally unstable person Mr Rollocks would brag, with a blogger present about commiting illicit activities.
11) Only a mentally unstable person Mr Rollocks would try to get me to sign over half my company, when your own family is saying, that you ask for 50/50%, but then you turn one five into a six and the other five into a four, and guess who gets the 40%?
12) I saw you taking cash for border point property Mr Rollocks in parliament, while the property is still very much in dispute.
13) Only a mentally unstable person would block their wife from their Facebook account. Remember that Julian? Remember I told you not to, that it was a bad idea? Sure enough, as soon as you blocked your wife she flew into St Maarten, and beat down Loyola. See Mr Rollocks for a crazy person, I've given you nothing but good advice, but you don't listen, and then you blame others when things don't go your way.
14) Why are you saying that I worked for your pawn shop? Is it because you're afraid to let the world know the online work that I did for you?

There's so much more Mr Rollocks, and you know my favorite song is Karen Carpenter's "We've only just begun", so thank you for your response, I'm only disappointed that the Today article was so inaccurate, it makes me wonder if Julian Rollocks was really the source because even the most basic facts were off.
And don't cry about accounts, when you had a bogus Theo Heyliger Facebook account set up, to get back at him.
You have my number, have your lawyer call me, so that I can let him know exactly where YOU stand, because you can't on all that medication!

JR......................and your ass was scared to show up at the DP rally again last night, because you were supposed to give a speech, but when you found out I was there, you conveniently got "sick" again.